October 1 update. Our PDGM and ICD-10 tools now use the FY2027 code set: 190 codes added, 30 deleted, and no existing code changed clinical group.

See what changed

Rock Bridge Home Health Agency Inc

Home health agency in Mcallen, Texas

Quality of care

Not rated yet

Patient survey

How patients did

Compared with the average Texas agency. The dot is this agency; the grey tick is the state average.

Care started on timeBetter than average

100.0%

Share of patients whose first visit happened on the date the doctor ordered, or within 2 days of the referral or of coming home from the hospital when no date was ordered.

State average 96.8% · U.S. average 96.5% · 55 of 55 patients

Patients got better at walkingBelow average

70.4%

Share of patients who could walk or move around more easily by the end of care.

State average 85.7% · U.S. average 88.6% · 24 of 39 patients

Falls with major injury· lower is betterBetter than average

0.0%

Share of patients who had a fall that caused a broken bone, head injury or similar during care. Lower is better.

State average 1.1% · U.S. average 0.9% · 0 of 55 patients

Patients sent home to the community

Share of patients who went home or to the community after home health and stayed out of a facility, adjusted for how sick patients were.

The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.

Preventable hospital stays during care· lower is better

Share of home health stays with a hospital or observation stay for a problem good care might have prevented, adjusted for how sick patients were. Lower is better.

The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.

See all 17 measures

Checked on flu shotBetter than average

67.5%

Share of patients who were determined to have received the flu shot for the current flu season, from the agency or elsewhere.

State average 64.4% · U.S. average 64.2% · 27 of 40 patients

Got better at getting in and out of bedBelow average

64.5%

Share of patients who needed less help getting in and out of bed by the end of care.

State average 85.8% · U.S. average 89.7% · 18 of 39 patients

Got better at bathingBelow average

55.7%

Share of patients who needed less help washing themselves by the end of care.

State average 87.8% · U.S. average 90.6% · 20 of 39 patients

Less short of breathBelow average

55.7%

Share of patients who were less short of breath by the end of care.

State average 88.0% · U.S. average 91.3% · 21 of 40 patients

Got better at taking medicinesBelow average

49.3%

Share of patients who could take their medicines correctly on their own by the end of care.

State average 86.5% · U.S. average 88.1% · 15 of 37 patients

Pressure ulcers that got worse or appeared· lower is betterBelow average

2.5%

Share of patients who developed a new or worsened pressure ulcer during care. Lower is better.

State average 0.2% · U.S. average 0.2% · 1 of 40 patients

Medication problems acted on in timeBetter than average

100.0%

Share of patients whose medications were reviewed at the start of care and, each time a medication problem was found, the doctor-recommended action was completed with timely follow-up.

State average 95.1% · U.S. average 94.5% · 55 of 55 patients

Met expected function at dischargeBelow average

36.8%

Share of patients whose ability to move and care for themselves at discharge met or beat what was expected for them.

State average 64.0% · U.S. average 71.7% · 14 of 38 patients

Medication list sent to the next provider

—

Share of patients whose current medication list was sent in a timely way to the next doctor or facility at transfer or discharge.

The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.

Medication list given to the patientBelow average

85.0%

Share of patients given their current medication list in a timely way when discharged to a home or similar setting.

State average 90.7% · U.S. average 92.2% · 34 of 40 patients

Preventable readmission within 30 days· lower is better

Share of patients readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of leaving home health for a problem good care might have prevented, adjusted for how sick patients were. Lower is better.

The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.

Medicare spending per episode

A ratio to the national average (1.00). Lower means less spending.

0.93

7% below the national average

What patients said

53% would definitely recommend this agency, from 14 patient surveys.

State average 80% · U.S. average 79% · 18% response rate. Based on fewer than 100 surveys, so this rating could move with a few more.

Care was professional
Not rated yet
Team communicated well
Not rated yet
Discussed medicines, pain and safety
Not rated yet
Rated the agency 9 or 10
Not rated yet

Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey. Use the scores shown, if any, with caution as the number of surveys may be too low to accurately tell how an agency is doing.

Medicare payment

Cohort

Smaller-volume

Total performance score

9.8 of 100

Cohort average 37.0

Payment adjustment

-3.6%

Payment year 2026

How it's calculated
  • Potentially preventable hospitalization— pts
    0% weight

    Achievement — · Improvement — · the higher one counts

  • Discharge to community5.9 pts
    16.67% weight

    Achievement 5.9 · Improvement 5.5 · the higher one counts

  • Improvement in dyspnea0.0 pts
    16.67% weight

    Achievement 0.0 · Improvement 0.0 · the higher one counts

  • Improvement in oral medications0.0 pts
    16.67% weight

    Achievement 0.0 · Improvement 0.0 · the higher one counts

  • Improvement in mobility0.0 pts
    25% weight

    Achievement 0.0 · Improvement 0.0 · the higher one counts

  • Improvement in self-care0.0 pts
    25% weight

    Achievement 0.0 · Improvement 0.0 · the higher one counts

  • ED use— pts
    0% weight

    Achievement — · Improvement — · the higher one counts

  • Care of patients— pts
    — weight

    Achievement — · Improvement — · the higher one counts

  • Communication— pts
    — weight

    Achievement — · Improvement — · the higher one counts

  • Specific care issues— pts
    — weight

    Achievement — · Improvement — · the higher one counts

  • Overall rating— pts
    — weight

    Achievement — · Improvement — · the higher one counts

  • Willingness to recommend— pts
    — weight

    Achievement — · Improvement — · the higher one counts

Each measure earns the higher of its achievement or improvement points. Points are weighted and summed into the total performance score.

About the agency

Services
Nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, home health aide
Ownership
For-profit
Certified
Since 2006
Address
901 E Redbud Suite 8b, Mcallen, TX 78504
ZIP codes served
78501, 78503, 78504, 78516, 78520, 78521, 78526, 78537, 78542, 78543, 78566, 78569
All 18 ZIP codes

78501, 78503, 78504, 78516, 78520, 78521, 78526, 78537, 78542, 78543, 78566, 78569, 78570, 78578, 78584, 78586, 78589, 78596

This is CMS data, not a Logicly rating. Better, about and below compare the agency with the state average. That is Logicly's reading of CMS numbers, not a CMS rating.