October 1 update. Our PDGM and ICD-10 tools now use the FY2027 code set: 190 codes added, 30 deleted, and no existing code changed clinical group.

See what changed

OASIS · CMS Q&As

M1342: CMS OASIS Q&As

8 questions CMS has answered, quoted whole from the CMS OASIS Q&As.

CMS OASIS Q&As · March 2026

M1342 on the OASIS item lookup

M1342 Q111.1Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M1342. What standards are used to assess cemented surgical wounds when answering OASIS item M1342 - Status of Most Problematic Surgical Wound that is Observable

When assessing a surgical incision that has been cemented rather than sutured, follow the same guidance found in Chapter 3 of the OASIS Guidance Manual, M1342 Status of most problematic surgical wound. 1. If the wound can be visualized, it is observable. Only surgical wounds that have a dressing that cannot be removed as directed by the physician/allowed practitioner and obscures visualization of the incision are considered non-observable. 2. For the purposes of determining the healing status, a surgical wound can be considered fully healed and not reportable as a current surgical wound approximately 30 days after complete epithelialization. The incision must be clean, dry and completely closed with no signs or symptoms of infection. 3. The Status of Most Problematic Surgical Wound that is Observable (M1342) is determined by assessment of the skilled clinician following the definitions outlined in Chapter 3 of the OASIS Guidance Manual, M1342 Status of most problematic surgical wound.

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; EDITED 10/18; EDITED 06/14; ADDED 09/09; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 10/08 Q4]

M1342 Q112.4Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M1342. If staples remain in a surgical wound, would it be considered as not healing?

A surgical wound with staples in place would only be considered not healing if it meets the definition of not healing as outlined in the OASIS Guidance Manual.

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; ADDED 09/09; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 07/08 Q9]

M1342 Q112.4.1Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M1342. When sutures are removed from surgical wounds healing by primary intention, how does it affect the healing status of the wound?

For the purposes of scoring M1342 - Status of Most Problematic Surgical Wound that is Observable, openings in the skin, adjacent to the incision line, caused by the removal of a staple or suture, are not to be considered part of the surgical wound when determining the status of the surgical wound. The status of these sites would be included in the comprehensive assessment clinical documentation. When determining the healing status of the incision, follow the definitions outlined in the OASIS Guidance Manual, in addition to other relevant current CMS Q&As. The status of "Not healing" would only be selected if the wound, excluding the status of the staple/suture site(s), meets the healing status descriptors.

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; EDITED 06/14; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 01/11 Q9]

M1342 Q112.5.2Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M1342. In reference to M1342, Status of Most Problematic Surgical Wound that is Observable, for surgical incisions healing by primary intention is it true that the only correct responses are “0-newly epithelialized” and “3-Not healing” as there are no open wound beds with granulation tissue?

Surgical incisions healing by primary intention do not granulate. Because of this the only response that could be appropriate for a surgical wound healing by primary intention would be 0-Newly epithelialized or 3-Not healing. “Newly epithelialized” should be chosen if the surgical incision has epidermal resurfacing across the entire wound surface, and no signs/symptoms of infection exist.

[Q&A EDITED 06/14; ADDED 01/11; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 04/10 Q13]

M1342 Q112.6Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M1342. Once the needle is removed from an implanted venous access device, before a scab has formed, the wound bed may be clean but non-granulating. Is it true that based on the OASIS guidance, the wound would be reported as Response 3 - Not healing for M1342?

When a needle is inserted and removed from an implanted venous access device, it is possible that the skin that was pierced by the needle could have a resulting wound that would heal by secondary intention. Usually, with good access technique and current needle technology there will be no perceptible wound. Occasionally, if there was an extremely large bore needle or traumatic entry or removal, there may be a resulting wound that heals by secondary intention. In this situation, the accessing clinician would rely on guidance outlined in the OASIS Guidance Manual to determine the healing status. Note that a scab is a crust of dried blood and serum and should not be equated to either avascular or necrotic tissue when applying the guidance. Therefore, while the presence of a scab does indicate that full epithelialization has not occurred in the scabbed area, the presence of a scab does not meet the criteria for reporting the wound status as "Not healing".

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; Q&A ADDED & EDITED 09/09; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 10/08 Q7]

M1342 Q112.6.1Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M1342. How do I mark the healing status of a Q-port that has needle access always in place? Would it be “non-healing?

The assessing clinician must determine the healing status of a wound following guidance in Chapter 3 of the current OASIS Guidance Manual and related CMS OASIS Q&As. Some sites, because they are being held open by a line or needle, cannot fully granulate and may remain "non-healing" while the line or needle is in place.

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; EDITED 06/14; ADDED 01/11; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 04/10 Q14]

M1342 Q112.6.1.1Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M1342. I have a patient receiving peritoneal dialysis every night. I understand that the peritoneal dialysis catheter site is considered a surgical wound (Cat. 4b Q102.1). What would the site’s healing status be for M1342?

Assuming the assessing clinician determines the peritoneal catheter site is the most problematic observable surgical wound, the clinician would determine the healing status of the wound following the definitions provided in the OASIS Guidance Manual, Chapter 3, M1342 Status of Most Problematic Surgical Wound that is Observable Coding Instructions. The peritoneal catheter exit site cannot fully granulate and/or epithelialize because of the presence of the catheter. In this scenario Response 3 - Not healing for M1342 would be appropriate.

[Q&A EDITED 10/23; EDITED 05/22; ADDED 10/16; Previously CMS Qtrly Q&A 07/16 Q5]

M1342 Q112.6.11Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M1342. If a patient is receiving antibiotics for a surgical site infection, but at the time of assessment, the patient no longer exhibits any signs or symptoms of infection, would the surgical wound be considered ''not healing''? In other words, is treatment for an infection, in the absence of current symptoms of infection, considered a sign/symptom of infection?

M1342 - Status of Most Problematic Surgical Wound that is Observable is reporting healing status based on the clinician's assessment of the patient and visualization of the wound. Since the patient could be at the point in the course of the antibiotic regimen where the infection has resolved, ongoing treatment for an infection should not be the sole basis for selecting 3 Not healing, unless signs and symptoms of infection are currently present.

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; ADDED 04/15; Previously CMS Qtrly Q&A 10/14 Q9]

Also mentioned in

Source: CMS OASIS Q&As: Category 4 - OASIS Data Set: Forms and Items (March 2026), text extracted from the PDF with pdftotext, retrieved 2026-10-09. Works of the US Government are in the public domain.

Every CMS OASIS Q&ACategory 4a - General Questions

The monthly home health regs digest

What CMS changed, what's due next, and what to do about it — one email a month, no fluff. Read the first issue