October 1 update. Our PDGM and ICD-10 tools now use the FY2027 code set: 190 codes added, 30 deleted, and no existing code changed clinical group.

See what changed

OASIS · CMS Q&As

M2001: CMS OASIS Q&As

9 questions CMS has answered, quoted whole from the CMS OASIS Q&As.

CMS OASIS Q&As · March 2026

M2001 on the OASIS item lookup

M2001 Q160.3.1Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001. In therapy only cases, can an LPN in the office work cooperatively with the therapist to complete the Drug Regimen Review (DRR) by performing elements of the DRR that the therapist will not be completing?

Only registered nurses, physical therapists, speech language pathologists and occupational therapists are qualified to perform comprehensive assessments. LPNs are not qualified to perform comprehensive assessments; however, the assessing clinician (RN or therapist) may seek collaboration from other agency staff, including LPNs, in order to complete any or all OASIS items. All staff are expected to function within the scope of their practice and state licensure.

[Q&A EDITED 10/18; EDITED 10/16; ADDED 01/12; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 01/11 Q16]

M2001 Q160.3.2Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001. On therapy only cases, can the therapist collaborate with a pharmacist when completing the Drug Regimen Review?

In a therapy only case, it would be acceptable for the therapist to collaborate with a pharmacist when performing the drug regimen review. Agency policy and practice will determine how the pharmacist participates in the drug regimen review process and how it is documented.

[Q&A EDITED 10/16; EDITED 06/14; ADDED 01/12; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 07/11 Q16]

M2001 Q160.3.3Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001. For therapy only cases, can we have our therapist complete the entire comprehensive assessment, except the Drug Regimen Review (DRR), and then have our agency send a nurse out to complete the entire DRR, including providing responses to the medication related OASIS questions to the assessing clinician?

Yes. The comprehensive assessment continues to be the responsibility of one clinician, the "assessing clinician". Collaboration, however, is allowed on any and all OASIS items, including the medication/DRR tasks and items. One example of collaboration allows the assessing clinician to visit the patient at home and conduct the actual patient assessment, compiling the medication list and evaluating the patient's status (e.g., presence of potential ineffective drug therapy, side effects or patient nonadherence). In another example of collaboration, the "collaborating clinician" might contact the patient by phone, to discuss issues with the patient regarding side effects they may be experiencing, or effectiveness of the medication. In any case, it is the assessing clinician who is ultimately responsible for ensuring a complete DRR was performed and for reporting the appropriate responses for medication related OASIS items. Note that collaboration options also allow a second clinician to contribute to the drug regimen review by allowing the assessing clinician to utilize information gathered from a second clinician's in-home assessment, during the timeframe in which collaboration is allowed. Agency policy and practice will determine the agency's processes and documentation expectations. The M0090 - Date Assessment Completed, is the last date that information used to complete the comprehensive assessment and determine OASIS coding was gathered by the assessing clinician and documentation of the specific information/responses was completed. It should be noted that in situations where nursing is admitting for a therapy only patient, the nurse could not complete or even start the comprehensive assessment (including drug review tasks) prior to the SOC date.

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; EDITED 10/18; EDITED 10/16; EDITED 04/15; ADDED 06/14; Previously CMS Qtrly Q&A 10/13 Q9]

M2001 Q160.3.5Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001. Would the use of essential oils be included in the Drug Regimen Review (DRR), whether taken orally, diffused, or used topically?

The Drug Regimen Review (DRR) includes all medications, prescribed and over the counter, including nutritional supplements, vitamins, and herbals administered by any route (e.g., oral, topical, sublingual, and by infusion). The DRR also includes total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and oxygen. Following these guidelines, use clinical judgment to determine whether other substances would be considered when conducting the DRR.

[Q&A ADDED 05/22; Previously CMS Qtrly Q&A 07/19 Q11]

M2001 Q160.3.6Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001. We have educated clinicians that it is a requirement that medication reconciliation be done. With this in mind, is it acceptable to electronically restrict clinicians from using a dash (–) as a response to M2001 - Drug Regimen Review by eliminating it as a response option in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), understanding that there still may be scenarios where the dash is the only correct response to this item?

A dash (–) is a valid response for M2001 - Drug Regimen Review. CMS expects dash use to be a rare occurrence. If elements of the drug regimen review were skipped, (for example drug-to-drug interactions were not completed), a dash should be reported, indicating the drug regimen review was not completed. A dash is also a valid response for this item and indicates no information is available. To be compliant, a dash must be available for clinician use where the dash is a valid response option for the OASIS item.

[Q&A ADDED 05/22; Previously CMS Qtrly Q&A 01/21 Q3; Also posted in Cat. 4a Q24.5]

M2001 Q160.4Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001 & M2003. The assessing clinician identifies a problem with medications. The patient has not picked up a prescription because they were not sure they absolutely needed it. If the assessing clinician’s education results in the resolution of the situation prior to the completion of the comprehensive assessment, can the clinician indicate on M2001 - Drug Regiment Review that there is no clinically significant problem, eliminating the need to address it in M2003 - Medication Follow-up?

If a medication related problem is identified and resolved by the agency staff not requiring physician/allowed practitioner (or physician-designee) contact by midnight of the next calendar day, the problem does not meet the definition of an actual or potential clinically significant medication issue in M2001- Drug Regimen Review.

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; EDITED 10/16; Previously CMS Qtrly Q&A 10/16 Q20; ADDED 01/11; Previously CMS OCCB Q&A 10/09 Q33]

M2001 Q160.4.2Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001 & M2003. With the expanded one clinician convention – would it be appropriate if a second clinician completed the Drug Regimen Review (DRR) in its entirety by phone and collaborated with the assessing clinician to respond to M2001 Drug Regimen Review and M2003 - Medication Follow-up?

While the expanded one clinician convention allows a second clinician to complete the drug regimen review (DRR) in its entirety and collaborate with the assessing clinician, it is expected that an in-person assessment would be included as appropriate in the process. While portions of the DRR may be conducted over the phone and/or by a clinician in the office (i.e., evaluating the medication list to assist with reconciling discrepancies), other portions of the DRR may require in-person assessment (e.g., evaluating the patient for effectiveness of medications or for the presence of significant side effects). The assessment must be completed within the required timeframe, and all requirements for the collaboration must be met. (See Cat. 2 Q15.3.1.)

[Q&A ADDED 05/22; Previous CMS Qtrly Q&A 04/18 Q10]

M2001 Q160.4.100Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001, M2003, M2005. When we complete a drug regimen review, our EMR software runs an interaction check between all the patient’s medications and flags any pertinent potential interactions. Our agency policy is to notify the physician within 3 days if any “high or medium alerts” are triggered. We want to confirm that our agency policy regarding this can be interpreted differently than the criteria used to identify a potential (or actual) clinically significant medication issue for M2001 - Drug Regimen Review. For example, we can comply with our agency policy to notify a physician when a high medication interaction is triggered by our EMR software, and still not consider it a potential (or actual) clinically significant medication issue, if the assessing clinician does not feel the situation warrants communication with the physician by midnight of the next calendar day. Our specific question is, is there anything related to our approach as described that does not align with the instructions for coding of M2001 - Drug Regimen Review?

M2001 - Drug Regimen Review identifies if a drug regimen review was conducted, and whether any potential or actual clinically significant medication issues were found. A potential (or actual) clinically significant medication issue is defined as a potential or actual issue that, in the clinician’s professional judgment, warrants physician/allowed practitioner (or physician-designee) communication and completion of prescribed/recommended actions by midnight of the next calendar day (at the latest). Any circumstance that does not require this immediate attention is not considered a potential or actual clinically significant medication issue for the purpose of the drug regimen review items. If, in your scenario, the medication alerts triggered by the EMR software do not meet the definition of a potential (or actual) clinically significant medication issue, then they would not be reported as such when coding M2001 - Drug Regimen Review, M2003 - Medication Follow-up, or M2005 - Medication Intervention.

[Q&A ADDED 11/24; Previously CMS Qtrly Q&A 04/24 Q6]

M2001 Q160.7Category 4b - OASIS Data Items

M2001, M2003, M2005, M2010, M2020. Our patient has nine herbal supplements that have been prescribed by their physician. Are herbal supplements considered medications when answering the OASIS items?

Herbal products, when prescribed or taken as a medication, are considered medication when completing the M OASIS Medication items (M2001, M2003, M2005, M2010, M2020). For example, Echinacea taken daily by mouth to stimulate the immune system, would be considered a medication for M2020 - Management of Oral Medications.

[Q&A EDITED 05/22; EDITED 10/16; ADDED 04/15; Previously CMS Qtrly Q&A 07/14 Q7]

Also mentioned in

Source: CMS OASIS Q&As: Category 4 - OASIS Data Set: Forms and Items (March 2026), text extracted from the PDF with pdftotext, retrieved 2026-10-09. Works of the US Government are in the public domain.

Every CMS OASIS Q&ACategory 4a - General Questions

The monthly home health regs digest

What CMS changed, what's due next, and what to do about it — one email a month, no fluff. Read the first issue